Sumit was on the scene for 2-3 minutes only and Joshua & Mike are not his friends and he do not socialize with them at all. With Joshua he has Spanish and with Mike he has Spanish and Band as common classes.
In this incident of Oct. 15 the point is not that who is the victim and who are the accused. All of them were 12 yrs old children and they all need to be protected. Mr. Plias is an adult on top of that protected by top notch attorneys with tax payers money, the victim Joshua was protected by the complaining adult, his parent made the complaint and other accused Mike was protected by Mr. Plias himself because of his religious back ground and may be his father’s clout in the administration. That is the reason Mr. Plias got or may be dictated a very mild statement from Mike who started the whole incident and made the actual comment that he was “goofing off” when he made the comment to Student 1; he realized only after speaking with Mr. Plias that what he said was wrong comment to Joshua.
For Sumit who is also 12 yrs old Mr. Plias could have got a statement that “after speaking with Mr. Plias he realized adding “Yeah there is” to the wrong comments of Mike that “there was a special Bus taking
We must raise the issue that no single religion or ethnic group should be allowed to have more than 45% control/representation of the local government. More then 45% control by one religion/ ethnic group creates anarchy and feudalism not DEMOCRACY. In such situations non members other than the Rulers community can never get any justice like in
With best regards,
Boy says he was accused of bullying a Jewish student because he was Hindu
Christie did not address the religion issue while responding to Gandhi.